Living doesn’t seem to require much thought or any cognitive effort,
I thought. When reading the book I realized that all the time we see things,
we imagine alternatives, we correlate different images, we see much more than
we perceived. It was wonderful.
As a psychologist, I try to keep in touch with
myself and see how the events affect me and in what way I change with every challenge
or task, and still find myself unable to grasp the concepts that could help me better
understand my life. Roy’s language and mastery of words has helped me find a
new way into looking at things around me, and made me much more willing to use
words in a synesthetic way, thus compelling more meaning than before. Somehow the
language was inside me and I needed a push to bring it into use, a model of
some sort, and that model came from a brilliantly written book.
The subject of the novel transcends culture, and speaks to
the inner human nature of us all. Although the cultural background of the
characters is different, because they live in India, the torment of trying to
find a way to live life in the most meaningful way possible is universal. The
story of love, of stereotypes and prejudices towards other people, the story of
how we can make social barriers so tall that we cannot climb or overcome during
a lifetime, is one that needs to be read over and over again until we are left
with only the truth about human life. That is to see that we need love, that
love is different throughout our life, that it evolves from one pure, almost
demanded, love possessed by children, into an ideal that eludes everyone who
happen to be in a society which dictates how love must be and who can live it.
That pure connection often thought of as true love might
come in different shapes, one between two twin brother and sister, one between a
single mother and her children, one between a divorced man and his ex-wife and
daughter, and one between an old woman and a twisted notion of love. We can see
the pursuit of love throughout the book, mainly through the pains which
accompany the feeling of fear of losing it. Rahel, the main character, a
view-point narrator, takes a journey back to the house where she discovered
love and felt she lost it. It’s a detailed account of events in which grief
takes many forms, starting with the grief of losing a loved someone, to the
grief of losing a sense of love and trying to find it once more. Rahel and
Estha, the twin dizygotic brother and sister, represent in a way a metaphor of
trying to live a life only half-filled with love, because they need the
presence of each other in order to feel complete.
The great charm and mystery of the book was, for me, the
ability to pin point certain raw aspects of relationships between humans, how
we let our fears rule society, or how we can let our fear rule our life in a
way that can only bring us sadness and pain. It is after all our decision about
how we want to live our life.
One of the fragments that I enjoyed mostly from the novel
is: “D’you know what happens when you hurt people? (…) When you hurt people,
they begin to love you less. That’s what careless words do. They make people
love you a little less.”
I end my review with this brilliant conclusion:
“It is after all so easy to shatter a story. To break a
chain of thought. To ruin a fragment of dream being carried around carefully like
a piece of porcelain.
To let it be, to travel with it,(…), is much the harder
thing to do.”
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu